Volume 5, Issue 1 (Winter-Spring 2022)
Mod Med Lab J 2022, 5(1): 10-13 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Elmezgueldi I, Mouhoub B, Nassiri O, Belmahi S, Farih S, Amrani A, et al . Verification of serum protein electrophoresis on the Cappilarys 2 Flex Piercing automaton. Mod Med Lab J 2022; 5 (1) :10-13
URL: http://modernmedlab.com/article-1-104-en.html
URL: http://modernmedlab.com/article-1-104-en.html
Imane Elmezgueldi 
, Boutaina Mouhoub , Omaima Nassiri , Sabrina Belmahi , Soumaia Farih , Abdsamad Amrani , El-houcine Sebbar , Mohammed Choukri
, Boutaina Mouhoub , Omaima Nassiri , Sabrina Belmahi , Soumaia Farih , Abdsamad Amrani , El-houcine Sebbar , Mohammed Choukri
Abstract: (2113 Views)
Introduction: The verification/validation of analytical equipment and methods is both part of this reasoning and an indispensable condition for their use and is one of the priorities of the medical biologist. The aim of our study is to verify the electrophoresis of serum proteins on the Cappilarys 2 Flex Piercing automaton.
Materials and methods: The evaluation methodology concerned the scope A which is based on the recommendations of the Valtec protocol of the French Society of Clinical Biology, as well as those of the SH-GTA O4 protocol of the COFRAC (Comité français d’accréditation). We studied the repeatability on normal and pathological serum samples, and the reproducibility on normal and pathological internal quality control samples.
Results: The values of the coefficient of variation of repeatability and reproducibility obtained by our study for each serum protein fraction (Albumin, Alpha-1, Alpha-2, Beta-1, Beta-2, Gamma globulins), are overall satisfactory and are in accordance with the requirements issued by the supplier and those issued by RICOS. In addition, these results are consistent with those of other similar studies.
Discussion and conclusion: This type of study will provide a solid basis for the realization of an accreditation procedure for the tests used in our laboratory. For any laboratory wishing to be accredited according to the ISO 15189 standard, the validation/verification of methods is a determining criterion. It is an essential step to be taken before the implementation of the newly acquired equipment.
Materials and methods: The evaluation methodology concerned the scope A which is based on the recommendations of the Valtec protocol of the French Society of Clinical Biology, as well as those of the SH-GTA O4 protocol of the COFRAC (Comité français d’accréditation). We studied the repeatability on normal and pathological serum samples, and the reproducibility on normal and pathological internal quality control samples.
Results: The values of the coefficient of variation of repeatability and reproducibility obtained by our study for each serum protein fraction (Albumin, Alpha-1, Alpha-2, Beta-1, Beta-2, Gamma globulins), are overall satisfactory and are in accordance with the requirements issued by the supplier and those issued by RICOS. In addition, these results are consistent with those of other similar studies.
Discussion and conclusion: This type of study will provide a solid basis for the realization of an accreditation procedure for the tests used in our laboratory. For any laboratory wishing to be accredited according to the ISO 15189 standard, the validation/verification of methods is a determining criterion. It is an essential step to be taken before the implementation of the newly acquired equipment.
Type of Study: Brief Original Article |
Subject:
Laboratory Methods
References
1. Can Çubukçu H, Vanstapel F, Thelen M, Bernabeu-Andreu F, van Schrojenstein Lantman M, Brugnoni D et al. Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2021;522:167-173. [DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2021.08.013]
2. Tosheska-Trajkovska, Katerina. “EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESMENT of MEDICAL LABORATORIES: REQUIREMENT of MKS EN ISO 15189:2013.” KNOWLEDGE - International Journal. 2019;35(4):1341-5. [Article]
3. Giannoli, J. M., Albarede, S., Avellan, T., Bouilloux, J. P., Cartier, R., Cohen, R et al. Recommandations pour la mise en place et le suivi des contrôles de qualité dans les laboratoires de biologie médicale. In Annales de Biologie Clinique. 2019; 77(5):577-597. [DOI:10.1684/abc.2019.1481]
4. Séguéla, J. P., Hermès, I., Iché, J. M., Lartigau, J., & Mura, P. (1999). Guide de bonne exécution des analyses de biologie médicale (GBEA): son application dans le secteur hospitalier public. Revue française des laboratoires. 1999; 309:27-37. [DOI:10.1016/S0338-9898(99)80052-3]
5. Guerra-Grajeda, A., Gabiño-López, N. B., & Muñoz-Rivas, A. General Evaluation of Risk Management in research laboratories with Integrated Quality Systems. Investigación en Discapacidad. 2020;7(3): 100-109. [Article]
6. Szymanowicz, A., Cartier, B., Couaillac, J. P., Gibaud, C., Poulin, G., Rivière, H., & Le Carrer, D. Proposition de commentaires interprétatifs prêts à l’emploi pour l’électrophorèse des protéines sériques. Ann Biol Clin. 2006; 64(4):367-80. [Article]
7. Capolaghi, B., Vassault, A., Grafmeyer, D., & Yvert, J. P. Le protocole Valtec: évolution du concept et du contenu. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1997; 55:167-173. [Google Scholar]
8. COFRAC, Guide Technique d'Accréditation de. Verification (Scope A). Validation (Scope B) of Methods in Medical Biology-Document SH GTA, 2015;4. [Article]
9. Vassault, A., Grafmeyer, D., De Graeve, J., Cohen, R., Beaudonnet, A., & Bienvenu, J. Annales de Biologie Clinique. In Annales de biologie Clinique. 1999;57(6):685-95. [Article]
10. Bossuyt, X., Lissoir, B., Mariën, G., Maisin, D., Vunckx, J., Blanckaert, N., & Wallemacq, P. Automated serum protein electrophoresis by Capillarys®. 2003; 704-710. [DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2003.107]
11. Ricós, C., Alvarez, V., Cava, F., Garcia-Lario, J. V., Hernandez, A., Jimenez, C. V et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.1999;59(7):491-500. [DOI:10.1080/00365519950185229]
12. Grossman, P. D., & Colburn, J. C. (Eds.). Capillary electrophoresis: Theory and practice. Academic Press. 2012. [Google Scholar]
13. OUADANI, E. Vérification des performances analytiques du Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing® et de l’Hydrasys 2 Scan® (Doctoral dissertation). 2018. [Article]
14. ATIG, M. N. Etude comparative de l'électrophorèse sur gel et l'électrophorèse sur l'automate capillarys. [Google Scholar]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
